From: "Lloyd SPENCER" <lloyd.spencer-AT-ntlworld.com>
Subject: Translations of the Dialectic of Enlightenment
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 21:38:20 +0100


Thanks to Claus Hansen for his note making tentative comparisons between the
translations. It is certainly useful to have the tough philosophical
terminology left strange. But otherwise the two translations were remarkably
close. I am looking forward to looking at the new translation more closely.

Lloyd

----- Original Message -----
From: "Claus Hansen" <clausdh-AT-tdcspace.dk>
To: <frankfurt-school-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu>; <marcusb49-AT-excite.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:11 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: Dialectic of Enlightenment translations


Dear all

I have also only read passages of the new translation but I have both and my
first impression is that the new translation is a lot better than the old
one
which cannot surprise given the development in readings on Adorno in
English since 1972 when the first translation appeared. The new edition
also has a lot of extra notes that give an insight into the changes A & H
made
to DoE in order for them not to appear to marxist in their exile in the
States.
There are also a few essays that deals with DoE and its relation to the
Frankfurt School development in that period.

This is a passage from the new and the old

"Myth becomes enlightenment and nature mere objectivity. Human beings
purchase the increase in their power with estrangement from that over
which it is exerted. Enlightenment stands in the same relationship to things
as the dictator to human beings. He knows them to the extent that he can
manipulate them. The man of science knows things to the extent that he
can make them. Their 'in-itself' becomes 'for him.' In their transformation
the
essence of things is revealed as always the same, a substrate of domination"
(DoE 2002 Edition p. 6).

"Myth turns into enlightenment, and nature into mere objectivity. Men pay
for the increase of power with alienation from that over which thet exercise
their power. Enlightenment behaves toward things as a dictator toward men.
He knows them in so far as he can manipulate them. The man of science
knows things in so far as the can make them. In this way their potentiality
is turned to his own ends. In the metamorphosis the nature of things, as
a substratum of domination, is revealed as always the same" (DoE 1972
Edition p. 9).

What is instructive is the differences in the passage I have made italic.
In the
old edition it is virtually impossible to understand what A & H are saying
while
it is (IMHO) much easier in the new edition. I think one of the problems
with
the old translation of both DoE and Negative Dialectics is that they do not
translate the philosophical terminology (for instance 'in-itself',
'for-him', 'reason',
'understanding', 'intuition' etc.) as they are done in the english
translations of Kant
and Hegel making it impossible to see when A & H are refering to and
building on Kantian and Hegelian understandings of the world.

Hope this helps,

Claus

At 15:03 16-06-03 +0100, L Spencer wrote:
>Perhaps before you get round to a review you would just give us a
>few pointed comparisons. A few lines (old vs. new) to give us a
>sense of whether there has been much movement.
>
>Lloyd Spencer
>
>
>On 15 Jun 2003, at 20:31, Andrew Perrin wrote:
>
> > I have the new translation and have read parts of it. I have been
planning
> > to write a review of the new translation for _Social Forces_ (of which I
> > am book review editor). I have no idea if or when I'll actually get
around
> > to it though.
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Andrew J Perrin - andrew_perrin-AT-unc.edu - http://www.unc.edu/~aperrin
> >  Assistant Professor of Sociology, U of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
> >       269 Hamilton Hall, CB#3210, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3210 USA
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 15 Jun 2003, Ralph Dumain wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > >To: marxistphilosophy-AT-yahoogroups.com
> > > >From: "marcus battle" <marcusb49-AT-excite.com>
> > > >Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 17:38:59 -0400 (EDT)
> > > >Subject: [marxistphilosophy] a lurker chimes in...
> > > >Reply-To: marxistphilosophy-AT-yahoogroups.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >greetings all,
> > > >
> > > >my name is marcus battle and i am entering the third year of my ph.d
> work
> > > >here at the university of memphis.
> > > >
> > > >now that the introduction is out of the way, i have a pretty straight
> > > >forward question...well, a couple actually--first, i heard from a
prof.
> > > >here that there is a new translation of The Dialectic of
> Enlightenment and
> > > >i was wondering if anyone on the list has checked it out yet. second,
if
> > > >so, i would very much like to know a) what the problems were with the
> > > >previous translation and b) how this one is an improvement (if at
> all). i
> > > >haven't read the book but, having suffered through another round of
> > > >comprehensive exams, was entertaining the idea of reading it. then i
> found
> > > >out about the new translation, and was wondering whether reading the
old
> > > >one would even be worth it in the end.
> > > >
> > > ><end transmission>
> > > >
> > > >marcus
> > >
> > >
> >

____________________________________________________________________________
"Hos mange mennesker er det allerede en uforskammethed, når de siger 'jeg'"
(T.W. Adorno)

--- StripMime Warning --  MIME attachments removed ---
This message may have contained attachments which were removed.

Sorry, we do not allow attachments on this list.

--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---