From: postmaster-AT-luthersem.edu.luthersem.edu Date: Sun, 18 Jun 95 01:55:07 CST >From smtp Fri Jun 16 21:35 CDT 1995 remote from luthersem.edu Received: from jefferson.village.virginia.edu by luthersem.edu.luthersem.edu; Fri, 16 Jun 95 21:35 CDT Received: from jefferson.village.virginia.edu by uvaarpa.virginia.edu id aa01725; 16 Jun 95 22:09 EDT Received: by jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU (5.67a8/1.34) id AA54243; Sat, 17 Jun 1995 01:45:25 GMT Received: from Alcor.Concordia.CA by jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU (5.67a8/1.34) id AA54235; Fri, 16 Jun 1995 21:45:23 -0400 Received: (from goua-AT-localhost) by alcor.concordia.ca (8.6.11/8.6.10) id VAA04909; Fri, 16 Jun 1995 21:45:16 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 Jun 1995 21:45:15 -0400 (EDT) From: alcor.concordia.ca!goua (ANTOINE GOULEM) To: jefferson.village.virginia.edu!habermas Cc: jefferson.village.virginia.edu!habermas Subject: Re: HAB: Critiques of 'Knowledge and Human Interests'? In-Reply-To: <00991EA8.132C96A5.21-AT-ford.anglia.ac.uk> Message-Id: <Pine.ULT.3.90.950616214047.1788A-100000-AT-alcor.concordia.ca> Content-Length: 396 Sender: owner-habermas-AT-jefferson.village.virginia.edu Precedence: bulk Reply-To: habermas-AT-jefferson.village.virginia.edu Status: O X-Status: I agree with with Martin about the good doctor's remarks aboput the futility of applying Habermas' work. If that's true then what the hell is the point? Wouldn't that that be the most damning confirmation of those commentators like (if I recall correctly)Leo Meeks who see in Habbermas' work a revisionist watering down of Adorno and Horkheimer, and Marx. A.Goulem goua-AT-alcor.concordia.ca
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005