From: postmaster-AT-luthersem.edu.luthersem.edu
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 95 01:55:07 CST



>From smtp Fri Jun 16 21:35 CDT 1995 remote from luthersem.edu
Received: from jefferson.village.virginia.edu by luthersem.edu.luthersem.edu; Fri, 16 Jun 95 21:35 CDT
Received: from jefferson.village.virginia.edu by uvaarpa.virginia.edu
          id aa01725; 16 Jun 95 22:09 EDT
Received: by jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU (5.67a8/1.34)
	id AA54243; Sat, 17 Jun 1995 01:45:25 GMT
Received: from Alcor.Concordia.CA by jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU (5.67a8/1.34)
	id AA54235; Fri, 16 Jun 1995 21:45:23 -0400
Received: (from goua-AT-localhost) by alcor.concordia.ca (8.6.11/8.6.10) id VAA04909; Fri, 16 Jun 1995 21:45:16 -0400
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 1995 21:45:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: alcor.concordia.ca!goua (ANTOINE GOULEM)
To: jefferson.village.virginia.edu!habermas 
Cc: jefferson.village.virginia.edu!habermas 
Subject: Re: HAB: Critiques of 'Knowledge and Human Interests'?
In-Reply-To: <00991EA8.132C96A5.21-AT-ford.anglia.ac.uk>
Message-Id: <Pine.ULT.3.90.950616214047.1788A-100000-AT-alcor.concordia.ca>
Content-Length: 396
Sender: owner-habermas-AT-jefferson.village.virginia.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: habermas-AT-jefferson.village.virginia.edu
Status: O
X-Status: 

I agree with with Martin about the good doctor's remarks aboput the 
futility of applying Habermas' work. If that's true then what the hell is 
the point?  Wouldn't that that be the most damning confirmation of those 
commentators like (if I recall correctly)Leo Meeks who see in Habbermas' 
work a revisionist watering down of Adorno and Horkheimer, and Marx.
A.Goulem   goua-AT-alcor.concordia.ca