From: N.R.Romm-AT-msd.hull.ac.uk (Norma Romm) Subject: RE: HAB: Habermas and social action Date: Thu, 20 Mar 1997 18:05:16 +0000 In reply to Anne Berkeley, I would "elaborate" on the distinction between facticity and validity by saying that the point is not to try and access some independently existing "facts", but rather to set up the discursive conditions for people to be able to decide how to assess one another's appeal to "experience". This is the point where validity issues arise. I wonder if this constitutes sufficient elaboration? Norma Romm --- from list habermas-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005