Subject: Re: HAB: Colonisation thesis
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 19:19:41 PDT


Dear Gary,

this hasn't been answered; if you are able to assist that'd be great. I 
can't contribute THAT much to discussion on more recent Habermas as my 
research project is centred on the TCA. I appreciate the unwillingness list 
members may have to retrace their own research steps, and remain grateful 
for the information list members have generously offered already.

I have another source to find this reference. My reason for broaching this 
issue with our list is like a fishing expedition I suppose...to see if the 
query raises any interest and may lead onto a fruitful discussion of what, 
for many, is one of Habermas's 'old hats' :-)

Best regards

Matthew Piscioneri


>From: EDavisMail-AT-aol.com
>Reply-To: habermas-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
>To: habermas-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
>Subject: Re: HAB: Colonisation thesis
>Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 23:09:13 EDT
>
>Has anyone replied to this?
>
> > Dear List members,
> >
> >  I have read mention of the fact that Habermas now rejects the 
>colonisation
> >  thesis he put forward in the TCA. I was wondering where is this 
>rejection
>to
> >
> >  be found, and what is put forward instead as an explanation of the
> >  pathologies of modernity?
> >
> >  If anyone is able to help, I would be very appreciative.
> >
> >  Matthew Piscioneri
> >  University of Tasmania
>
>
>      --- from list habermas-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com



     --- from list habermas-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---