Subject: Re: HAB: #2: Autonomy as dogma Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2000 13:22:22 GMT Dear Antti, thanks for the ramble :-) I can assure you that all information is useful to this struggling student of Habermas! Your musings here are particularly interesting... >The Kantian strategy is to argue that we cannot prove that we >are free (and so autonomous), but all the while we cannot help >conceiving ourselves as such. Given many layperson's critical existential attitude has - I would argue - both a self-preservationist premise AND the dogma of autonomy at the core of their understanding of the world; what chance has a program of critical reform which seeks to draw its normativity from sources OTHER than these (illusory or not)? Just an antipodean pre-bedtime thought on a wet July night. Best Regards, MattP ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com --- from list habermas-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005