Subject: Re: HAB: RE: habermas and brandom
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 01:14:05 GMT


Dear Ken,

My poor expression here:

> > It seems far too determinate to suggest that
> > this gap is filled - as it were - by the lifeworld.

I was suggesting that this could be a Habermasian reply, not yours.Sorry.

>I suggested that this entails an imaginary relation
>between speaking subjects - but I did not mean to say that this gap is 
> >filled
>by the lifeworld.

MattP
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com



     --- from list habermas-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---