From: Vunch-AT-aol.com Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 18:14:10 EST Subject: Re: HAB: Re: Habermas & Freud --part1_bb.a4f530e.277bd1c2_boundary In a message dated 12/26/00 12:12:00 PM Eastern Standard Time, kenneth.mackendrick-AT-utoronto.ca writes: > Key in each is our relation to desire, jouissance, > and the Other... I tentative sketched it this way in a footnote: the > discourse > of the master is similar to instrumental reason, the discourse of the > hysteric > is similar to communicative reason, the discourse of the university to > mythic > thinking (non-reflective mimesis) and the discourse of the analyst is close > to > Do you mean empathic or emphatic? If emphatic reason, what is it? Vunch --part1_bb.a4f530e.277bd1c2_boundary
HTML VERSION:
Key in each is our relation to desire, jouissance,
and the Other... I tentative sketched it this way in a footnote: the
discourse
of the master is similar to instrumental reason, the discourse of the
hysteric
is similar to communicative reason, the discourse of the university to
mythic
thinking (non-reflective mimesis) and the discourse of the analyst is close
to
emphatic reason (reflective mimesis).
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005