Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:58:15 -0600 From: Bill Hord <hord_b-AT-hccs.cc.tx.us> Subject: Re: HAB: Follow-up, re: Lifeworld & fallibilism Consider the following paragraph from On the Pragmatics of Communication, pp. 243-244: "Like all unthematic knowledge, the background of the lifeworld is implicitly and prereflectively present. It is distinguished, first, by its mode of _immediate certainty_ [original emphasis]. ... Such background knowledge lacks an internal relation to the possibility of becoming problematic for it comes into contact with criticizable validity claims, thereby being transformed into fallible knowledge, only at the moment in which it is expressed in language. Absolute certainties remain unshakable until they suddenly disintegrate; for, in lacking fallibility, they do not constitute knowledge in the strict sense at all." This passage suggests the relation of fallibilism to validity claims--which I suppose goes along with your notion of defeasibility. (I found this passage, by the way, in following your suggestion of looking up 'fallibilism in the index.) Also note the idea of prelinguistic knowledge, which is obviously true in my opinion, but which Habermas seems to deny sometimes. I'm thinking in particular of the section on Mead in TCA2. I wonder, though, if 'knowledge' must be linguistic to be fallible. Animals certainly form fallible expectations/beliefs. This is so obvious, to me, that I wonder what I'm missing as far as H. is concerned. I wrote: > > [Habermas] claims that fallibilism toward practical contexts of > > action is not defensible--I think drawing on a bounds of sense kind > of argument--the lifeworld cannot be questioned without performative > > contradiction. Gary D wrote: > Where does he claim this? I would imagine that, inasmuch as Habermas > *focuses* on fallibilism (does he?), he would--as you say--not find a > doctrine about beliefs appropriate to evaluations of action. But > where does he deal with this? (I will follow up on Matthew's > reference.) > -- Bill Hord hord_b-AT-hccs.cc.tx.us "Nonidentity is the secret telos of identification, that which is to be rescued in it; the mistake of traditional theory is that it holds identity as its goal." (Adorno, "Negative Dialectics") --- from list habermas-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005