From: "matthew piscioneri" <mpiscioneri-AT-hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: HAB: Hab's method in BFN
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 05:25:42 


Dear John, Steve & Fred

thanks for your responses. My original unease stemmed from the uncertainty 
(I still have) over whether Habermas's _BFN_ is designed to state what *is*, 
what *should* be or what *could* be !!!

My discomfort probably stems from being too monotonal in terms of expecting 
that theory construction can only be ONE thing or another. His methodology 
is what makes Habermas such an intriguing theorist to this reader at least.

Thanks again,

MattP
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.



     --- from list habermas-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---