From: HeyJoeT-AT-t-online.de (Joachim Teipel)
Subject: Re: HAB: Adorno & Habermas
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 21:30:43 +0100


Dear Matthew,

here are the titles of two older books which I found in the second resp. third 
row of my upper bookshelf - what is probably the reason why I never read them 
and therefore cannot tell you anything about the contents. But perhaps they 
might be useful with regard to your question:

Gerd KIMMERLE: Verwerfungen. Vergleichende Studien zu Adorno und Habermas. 1986
Claudia RADEMACHER: Versoehnung oder Verstaendigung ? Kritik der Habermasschen 
Adorno-Revision. 1993.

Best wishes

Joachim

matthew piscioneri schrieb:
> Dear List,
>
> I realise this may be old hat to many on the List, but I am seeking 
> participants in a dialogue about the development of Habermas's reaction 
> to/reconstruction of Adorno's work in particular; although this will 
> necessarily broach Horkheimer's co-authorship of the _DoE_.
>
> The thesis I am trying to explicate is that a shift occurred between  JH's 
> theoretical relationship to Adorno's (and Horkheimer's) work between the 
> 1960s and 1970s (more reconstructive and continuous) to the more rhetorical 
> stance (irruptive) introduced in the _TCA_ and especially in the 
> _Philosophical Discourse of Modernity_.
>
> It is useful to contrast his *overt* views in _PDM_ with the *covert* views 
> expressed in the interviews collected in Dews' _Autonomy & Solidarity_.
>
> regards,
>
> MattP
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
>
>
>      --- from list habermas-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---



     --- from list habermas-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---