File spoon-archives/habermas.archive/habermas_2001/habermas.0112, message 15

Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 20:51:41 -0800 (PST)
Subject: HAB: Bob Scheetz (re: this month's "samizdat")

--- bob scheetz <> wrote:

>...would it be possible, in the ideal court of discourse ethics, to
entertain the righteousness of a 9/11 strategy?  

Would it be possible for you to interpret something in *terms of
Habermas's work* or to share your engagement with his work or foster
engagement?  Or is this just not possible for you?  

Show how your comment above is not about rationalizing pathological

Make a case, in terms of JH's work, one way or another, about
something specific. Or get specific about something in JH's work that
you want to understand--or share with others what is worth their
thinking about, in your view, relative to JH's work.  In all the
years of interaction here, is there nothing worth your participatory

Why should one not see a posting from you as just something to delete
without reading? (I confess that I got to that point long ago, but
ventured to read your posting tonight, only to regret it, again).

Be constructive, please. Thank you.


Do You Yahoo!?
Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
your unique holiday gifts! Buy at
or bid at

     --- from list ---


Driftline Main Page


Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005