Subject: Re: HAB: life world
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 02:11:52 +0000
<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV>
<P>Hello Tom,</P>
<P>Not quite sure of the sense you are intending here (long live intentionalist semantics!):<BR><BR>>In whatever case, however, we can appeal to having </P></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>inherited reason from our own lifeworld background. A background
<DIV></DIV>>which while presenting limits to unearthing and dissection, we must
<DIV></DIV>>simultaneously move forward with.
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Is the appeal in the "moral" situation?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Like Habermas seems to do, do you mean that we can only undertake moral discourse because the lifeworld in constituted in modernity on the basis of communicative rationality?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>mattP</DIV></div><br clear=all><hr>Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. <a href='http://g.msn.com/1HM501201/44'>Click Here</a><br></html>
--- from list habermas-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005