From: "Ali Rizvi" <ali_m_rizvi-AT-hotmail.com> Subject: HAB: Some relavent quotes Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2003 05:17:53 +0000 As an appendix to my earlier post on America, Europe and Habermas I beg the consideration of the following quotes: 1)“America in every important respect …. has the predominant power to shape frameworks and influence outcomes. This implies that it can draw the limits within which others choose from a restricted list of options the restrictions being in large part a result of US decisions” (Strange 1989 p. 169). 2)“What is emerging therefore is a non-territorial empire with its imperial capital in Washington, D.C. Where imperial capitals used to draw courtiers from outlying provinces, Washington draws lobbyists from outlying enterprises, outlying minority groups, and globally organized pressure groups… As in Rome, citizenship is not limited to a master race and the empire contains a mix of citizens with full legal and political rights, semicitizens and noncitizens like Rome’s slave population. Many of the semicitizens walk the streets of Rio or of Bonn, of London or Madrid, shoulder to shoulder with the noncitizens; no one can necessarily tell them apart by color or race or even dress. The semicitizens of the empire are many and widespread. They live for the most part in the great cites of the noncommunist world. They include many people employed by the large transnational corporations operating in the transnational production structure and serving as they are all very well aware, a global market. They include the people employed in transnational banks. They often include members of the ‘national’ armed forces, those that are trained, armed by, and dependent on the armed forces of the United States. They include many academics in medicine, natural sciences, and social studies like management and economics who look to U.S. professional associations and to U.S. universities as the peer group in whose eyes they wish to shine and to excel. They include people in the press and media for whom U.S. technology and U.S. examples have shown the way, (Strange, 1989 p. 167). 3)“the three great imperatives of (US) geopolitical strategy are to prevent collusion and maintain dependence among the vassals, to keep tributaries pliant and to keep the barbarians from coming together’ (Brzezinski, Zbigniew, 1997 p.40). * Strange S. (1989) ‘Towards A Theory of Transnational Empire” in F.O. Czempeil and J. Rosenau (ed.) Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges Lexington p. 153-180 * Brerzesnki Z. (1997) The Grand Chessboard New York Colombia University Press. _________________________________________________________________ Worried what your kids see online? Protect them better with MSN 8 http://join.msn.com/?page=features/parental&pgmarket=en-gb&XAPID=186&DI=1059 --- from list habermas-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005