Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 03:52:16 -0400 Subject: Re: HAB: _Philosophy in a Time of Terror_ is available Paul Berman is a complete fraud, perhaps as fraudulent as Gary Davis, though I doubt that is possible. First, there is the general question of Berman's public role as a mediator between the mainstream and the "left", a professional watchdog, gatekeeper and adjudicator of ongoing trends, in other words, superficial and opportunistic. As regards to 9-11 and the USA's war of aggression against Iraq, Berman's spin could not be more reactionary, justifying the war by portraying, not without little tidbits of fact, the anti-war opposition as knee-jerk anti-Americans and apologists for third world fascism. BTW, there is no such thing as a "just war" in any metaphysical sense. There is at best self-defense-- practical not a metaphysical issue--but the invasion of Iraq was not that in the least. The invasion of Afghanistan may have involved self-defense--though we may never know because we have been lied to so thoroughly--but that too was basically a geopolitical maneuver as part of Washington's imperial game plan. There is of course a basis in fact for Berman's complaints, his pro-imperialist apologetics notwithstanding. The American activist community is full of confusion and ideological incoherence, fed undoubtedly by marginalization, exhaustion and plain old desperation. Having participated in several anti-war demonstrations, I can attest to a number of lame slogans and chants, trite street theatre, and old crap recycled from the 60s, indicating the low intellectual level upon which Americans in general operate; nonetheless I saw evidence of some really sharp and incisive thinking. As in all coalitions, there is every shade of opinion represented, from addled abstract pacifism ('an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind') to extreme sectarianism. There is also an obnoxious undertone from some people concerning 9-11 that we had it coming. Nonetheless, the legitimacy of the antiwar movement stands on its own in spite of the dumbest tendencies of the activist subculture, whose biggest fault is that it really is a subculture and thus fertile soil for irrationalist tendencies. This problem is well worth analyzing. Some more thoughtful people in the left press have expressed their concerns, but media celebrities are not very scrupulous about it. Berman is just an opportunist prick. I am much more disappointed in Christopher Hitchens. At 07:14 AM 5/25/2003 +0000, Ali Rizvi wrote: >Thanks Gary, > >Also John Gray has a book called Al Qaeda and What It Means to Be Modern >out this month. Independent has its review. After Habermas industry we >have September 11 industry. > >Good luck! > >best >ali --- from list habermas-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005