Subject: Re: [HAB:] success vs. aim
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 00:59:39 +0300 (EEST)



> >'Inform' is perhaps not the most felicitious example, since it involves
> truth, but let's stick to it. Ken didn't inform you of anything, because
> he made a mistake.
> 
> Good grief. Didn't anyone read my follow up? The document does exist. 


Mea culpa! I confess I didnŐt read either the original or the follow-up.
I just took up GaryŐs example and its assumptions. Thanks for informing
me, and my apologies.

Antti


     --- from list habermas-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---