From: "matthew piscioneri" <mpiscioneri-AT-hotmail.com> Subject: Re: [HAB:] The content of reasons [Ali, Antii] Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:00:43 +0000 George, tough question! >If that's the case, what would be the basis for any quasi-transcendental >aspect in Habermas's thought if it is not, therefore, the ideal speech >act? Yes, if the content of reasons are contingent (socio-historically), how can a speaker *aim* at unconditionality? so back to idealization, as you suggest. mattp. _________________________________________________________________ Chat via SMS. Simply send 'CHAT' to 1889918. More info at http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilemania/MoChat.asp?blipid=6800 --- from list habermas-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005