File spoon-archives/heidegger.archive/heidegger_1997/97-02-14.161, message 11


Date: Fri, 31 Jan 1997 00:13:25 +0800
From: malcolm riddoch <riddoch-AT-central.murdoch.edu.au>
Subject: Re: preconceptions & connections


>The point is that 'quality' of life is increased dramatically when one puts
>asid e one'e tendency to 'agree/disagree' and is 'present' to one's 'loved'
>ones shall we say. (as an example) ...'granting beingness' to someone has an
>incredible result.  ...in practice.  ...remember whether 'your
>interpretation' of some 'discourse' on being 'fits' here or not is not
>relevent.  ...once again, i'm not a professional philospher here to interact
>on the academic merit of 'transformation.'

>Robert T. Guevara

Fair enough, I certainly don't mean to devalue your practical take up of
Heidegger and if it works for your family then good on you. I would never
want to question that at all and I wish you well. But you asked for a
discussion so I responded according to my own interests, and this other
questioning of being is a research interest of mine at the moment, academic
or otherwize.

malcolm




     --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---



   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005