Date: 31 Jan 97 21:21:04 EST
From: robert scheetz <76550.1064-AT-CompuServe.COM>
Subject: the Geuvara happening


Am unclear re the quality of the animus toward Engineer Guevara:
high churchmen for le stil California?, commercialism?,
exhibitionism?, charlatanry?....

For it does recall a particular doctrine, praxis vs analysis, of that earlier
era, the Sartrean vogue, which I know to be disdained, but have not seen
explained.  

Permiso:
If discursive speech is a nihilistic technology vis a vis beyng,
while poiesis is saving, Sartre's point that post modern philosophy
is accomplished in art, not philosophy books, is correct.  Similarly,
since "thinking" is an enframing, a reifying that submerges beyng; while
praxis presences beyng...(in earnest of which MH, like Sartre, gave up
brahminism for revolution; and in its default, returning, his "thinking" took
the from of a "destruction of thinking"), Engineer Guevara is right,
despite all his protestations about not wanting to diss anyone, in pointing to
the absurdity (i.e. for heideggerians; i.e. persons once convinced on this
doctrine of nihilation) of engaging the thought of Heidegger discursively.



     --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---