Date: Sun, 22 Feb 1998 22:35:41 +0100 From: Henk van Tuijl <Henk.van.Tuijl-AT-net.HCC.nl> Subject: Re: estimation and thinking Allen Scult wrote: > I'm tempted here to relate this notion which we might call "hermeneutical > over-estimation" (a somewhat care-less term I admit) to Nietzsche's will to > power as a very risky re-valuing, over-turning of the traditional way of > understanding things. Might one way of making this move be to > over-estimate a text and thereby re-cover something of its orginal sense of > the question? Fraentzki probably does overestimate the question concerning being in the "hermeneutical" sense. At the same time, he does not just "over-estimate" but also justiifies its importance - within the context of his book, i.e. a re-thinking of the main Heideggerian themes. He seems to over-estimate his subject in a non-hermeneutical sense when he criticizes Habermas and Gadamer because they don't fit into this context (don't think within the Heideggerian tradition). "Hermeneutical over-estimation" seems to legitimate a liberal attitude towards a "text". Kindest regards, Henk --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005