File spoon-archives/heidegger.archive/heidegger_1998/heidegger.9802, message 130


From: Alexander Carnera Ljungstroem <Alexander.Carnera.Ljungstroem-AT-jur.ku.dk>
Subject: SV: estimation and thinking
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 1998 16:13:16 +0100


Dear Heid. freaks.

I have been studyung Heidegger for some years now. Right now I want to
write a more funny article on Heidegger. Its difficult to find humourous
stuff on Heidegger but I have heard som rumours about Heidegger being
extremely interesting in football (european!). In fact, the rumour says
good old Martin wqs watching the worldcup-final in 1974 (or was the
european champianship in 72?) and his Television broke down. He rushed
to the neighbour begging him for seeing the rest of the match. Three
major questions arise: (1) Did Heidegger miss Hollands first goal on
penalty? (2) Is there a great similarity between Franz Beckenbauer and
Heidegger regarding sport, culture and character (not politics!) and (3)
Is there a hidden dimension in football (e.i. Ballbehandlung) that
resembles that of Heidegger=B4s thinking. Is the soccor field the highway
of Dasein? Can anyone verify Heidegger=B4s great interest in sport and
particular football and would it happen that anyone of you can give me
some hints to a deeper narrative of this story about what happened this
famours summerafternoon when Martin=B4s TV broke down. Maybe a hidden
article, or an uncle of some friend of Matin=B4s brother who knew of
Martin=B4s weakness for soccer. Please let me know soon and if anyone of
you is planning a book on Heidegger and football, do not hesitate to
inform me.

Alexander, Heidegger and footballfan.









>----------
>Fra: 	Henk van Tuijl[SMTP:Henk.van.Tuijl-AT-net.HCC.nl]
>Sendt: 	23. februar 1998 17:23
>Til: 	heidegger-AT-jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU
>Emne: 	Re: estimation and thinking
>
>Allen Scult wrote:
>> I assume the liberal attitude you mean here is not a good thing,
>> but I was wondering which of the "not good things" connoted by
>> liberal you were referring to here.
>
>Liberal is a good thing imo. In the sense of using a text
>as a kind of building-stone for a new text (not unlike
>Derrida's note on a note in _Sein und Zeit_) - the way
>composers "cite" other composers, sculptors use tin cans,
>etc.
>
>This liberal use might not only be seen as legitimated by
>hermeneutical over-estimation but also as the product of
>a specific kind of hermeneutical over-estimation. Cf.
>your example:
>
>> Jeremiah creates a moment of prophecy out of interpretation
>> when he over-estimates certain moments in the Exodus account
>> of the covenant.
>
>Just a thought, is hermeneutical over-estimation not the
>only (true) kind of hermeneutics?
>
>Kindest regards,
>Henk
>
>
>
>
>     --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
>


     --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005