Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 18:02:53 +0100 Subject: Re: Heidegger on Husserl From: artefact-AT-t-online.de (Michael Eldred) Cologne, 02 March 1998 j md schrieb in reply to ME: > Thus Dasein does not intend anything (Zeug) in the world, but is alwa > ys already in the world with beings (Sein-bei...). There is no room? > or Time? for intentionality because being has always already opened i > tself to Dasein in its Da. > > Perhaps, you see the usage of the word "intentionality" as having no > possible neutral usage? That is why I think that your dispute may be > semantical. Thanks for your thoughts, Jim, especially on the Japanese, which I find extremely interesting for its experience of human being as a between-ness. In rephrasing the above perhaps I should rather say: Sein-bei... is the condition of possibility of any intentional comportment towards beings (Zeug). The movement in the transcendental thinking in SuZ is always a moving back into more fundamental conditions of possibility. Thus intentionality is an originary phenomenon for Husserl, whereas it is no longer so for Heidegger. But it seems that Malcolm is right to focus on Zeitlichkeit (see my other post with the same date). There one can see the O.D. opening up, i.e the abyss out of which the world comes in which Dasein exists. Regards, Michael _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- artefact text and translation _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- made by art _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- http://www.webcom.com/artefact/ _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_ artefact-AT-t-online.de-_-_ _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_ Dr Michael Eldred -_-_-_ _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005