File spoon-archives/heidegger.archive/heidegger_1998/heidegger.9805, message 177


Date: Mon, 25 May 1998 16:04:16 +0200
From: Henk van Tuijl <Henk.van.Tuijl-AT-net.HCC.nl>
Subject: Re: Actuality (re. Heidegger, Husserl, etc)


Daniel James Arthur Tarte wrote:
I wouldn't mind hearing about that reference to Husserl and Heidegger.

Daniel, I you do not mind, I'll answer your last mail step for step -
and keep it as short and simple as possible. 

First, see for the reference to Husserl and Heidegger Biemel's
_Gesammelte Schriften_ Band 1 p 173-207. Biemel describes Heidegger's
personal reactions on Husserl's article in the Encyclopaedia Britannica.
According to Biemel Heidegger's criticizes in essence the lack of
differentiation of the _is_. The Being of Man is unlike Being in
general.

The rest follows.

Kindest regards,
Henk



     --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005