Date: Mon, 25 May 1998 18:03:33 +0200 Subject: Re: Self-evidently so ... Cologne, 25 May 1998 Laurence Paul Hemming commented: > On waking, I find two posts this morning make a similar suggestion: > > >George Steiner makes several references to Heidegger's work; "Replace > >Sein by 'God' in all the key passages and their meaning becomes > >pellucid." > > >Reading "The Origin of the Work of Art" by replacing the notion of "Art > >Work" with the notion of "Psychotherapeutic Work" is pretty interesting > > Of course it's more simple than that. I have long known that if I replace > all occurrences of the term "Dasein" in the Gesamtausgabe with "my > Grandmother", it's clear that Heidegger was actually talking about my > Grandmother. I wish she'd mentioned it. I wonder I never saw it before. > > Or just perhaps "God", "Psychotherapeutic Work" and "my Grandmother" do not > always name self-evidences (maybe Heidegger even knew this himself?)? Might > Heidegger himself have thought that being and God were not the same? Did > no-one ever bother to ask him whether he thought they were - was it so > self-evident what the answer was (actually, yes they did ... GA15 p. 436)? > Now what do I do? Laurence, what is to be done with such pellucidity? As Steiner says, it comes from mapping the thinking of being back into two-thousand-year-old ruts in thinking. We in the Western metaphysical tradition understand the _summum ens_ all too well. How to get out of our rut? As Rafael Capurro points out, only a leap (der Satz vom Grund) will do it. We need other ears for what is unheard-of. Later in life, Heidegger remarked that he was asked about once a fortnight whether by Sein he meant God. There is solace in the well-worn and in familiar routine. How often is it noticed that routine and the familiar also immew and immure? Metaphysically, being has been thought as the beingness of beings. This leaves room for being to be understood as a being, namely, the supreme being, which is the ground of everything that is. Now, If we wanted to leap from The ground of everything, Where on Earth would we be? Michael _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- artefact text and translation _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- made by art _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- http://www.webcom.com/artefact/ _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_ artefact-AT-t-online.de-_-_ _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_ Dr Michael Eldred -_-_-_ _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005