From: SD19587-AT-swt.edu Date: Fri, 01 May 1998 13:44:48 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: Heidegger & Kuhn Anthony: Thanl you for your reply concerning Heidegger and Kuhn. I agree with you that this marks the essential difference between the two. But do you think that, given this way of looking at Heidegger, viz., as a supporter of the view that objectivity traditionally conceived is parasitic upon actual lived practice, anything of real substance distinguishes Heidegger from the pragmatic tradition? For they also argue that objectivity without personal involvement is a myth, i.e., that the thing-in-itself is a myth, and that theory and practice should not be (or cannot be) separated. Are the pragmatists still within the tradition of "conceptual philosophy" (understood as that which separates Heidegger from Kuhn)? Thanks again and I look forward to further discussion, Shane Denson --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005