From: "henry sholar" <H_SHOLAR-AT-marta.uncg.edu>
Date:          Thu, 28 May 1998 7:04:14 EST
Subject:       Re: God and Being



>While you could replace Being with God, it would corrupt the basic 
>nature of SuZ by altering the intensely personal, phenomenological 
>nature of the effort.  You would bring a second party, so to speak, 
>into the dialogue in such way as to fundamentally alter the purpose 
>of understading [insert Being].

its been done.
the marburger protestants and some of the contemporary
catholic theologians went double-dog ape shit over SuZ.
To wit:  Bultmann, Tillich, Rahner and many many others.



     --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---