Subject: Re: God and Being Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 21:45:48 +0200 Michael, the question of god and the question of being are indeed, according to Heidegger (and in contra-diction to metaphysical tradition) two different questions concerning two different matters. According to H. metaphysics (Aristotle) was asking for a (!) being that would give the measure for all other beings (ontology=theology). H. intends to separate both questions: the being of god is not the measure for the being of beings. Why? Well because according to metaphysics the being of god is conceived as permanent presence (aei nun, nunc stans). H. _falsifies_ (in a Popperian way) metaphysics by showing that there is at least one being (Dasein) whose being is not only presence but - time (past and future). Further on H. shows that this first approximation to the question of being only provides a _relative_ foundation of ontology, given that other ways of being (of beings) such as mathematical objects, readiness-to-hand etc. cannot be related to the preliminary _foundation_ of the analytic of Dasein without distorting in some way their specificity. Further on H. states that there is no _a_ frame of casting being but that this question is subjected to historic variations. Hegel had tried to connect all this forms into a single (hi)story but the price for this is a a-historical (theological) fundament (metaphysics once again). There is no question of substituting Got for Being, but a question of how God's (and human's) being can be casted. Tradition thought human _being_ according to _the_ Being of God, identifying indeed God and Being. Heidegger is not just doing the contrary but trying to separate the question of being, from the question of god and finally also from the question of Da-sein as far as Being and Dasein _need_ each other but are not _the same_ (in the sense of _das Gleiche_, maybe in the sense of _das Selbe_ i.e. that they belong together although they are ant-agonistic). By thus re-placing the question of being outside the question of god H. at the same time lets open the way(s) of casting god's being (I recall in this regard that K. Rahner was one of the first theologians to think the question of an evolution of christian _dogmata_...). So, thinking being within the context of _a-letheia_ give us the opportunity not only to _state_ the question of god from a very different horizon as done by (metaphysical) tradition but also , given the historicity of being, to become open for a casting of being _inside_ which a god may shine. This is not a gnostic proposition of _waiting for Godot_ but it means simply the acknowledgement that there is (probably) a being whose appearence (or disappearence) is not dependent (alone) on our casting. Yes, there is some _theologia negativa_ in all this, if we here the word _negative_ in the sense of the _lethe_ i.e. as a dimension possibilitating the shining. In short: no identification of being and god but a separation of both questions (and subjects), although replacing the question of being into an existential context gives rise to a _new_ thinking of god's being. All this remains terribly speculative if we do not conceive it in the sense of a _formale Anzeige_ i.e. as a start for living without fundament, open (among others) to _some-thing_ we have being calling (in both sense of the word) got. kind regards rafael -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Mike Staples <mstaples-AT-argusqa.com> An: heidegger-AT-lists.village.Virginia.EDU <heidegger-AT-lists.village.Virginia.EDU> Datum: Donnerstag, 28. Mai 1998 19:42 Betreff: Re: God and Being >Prof. Dr. Rafael Capurro wrote: > >> This is, in my opinion, a way of thinking God (or >> god(s)) within the horizon of _a-letheia_. > >What is the difference between saying that we can substitute God for >Being (and thereby find a new way of thinking both), and saying that we >have a "way of thinking god...within the horizon of a-letheia"? > >Michael Staples > > > > --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005