Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 17:45:22 -0700 Subject: leap of faith Dr. Eldred writes: >> [...] >> Now, >> If we wanted to leap from >> The ground of everything, >> Where on Earth would we be? i said earlier: >we would be where we are. > >the leap comes as we complete our metaphysical questioning. if only for a >moment. as we come to an end -- perhaps informed by our personal history >but not given by it. >[...] i don't have the actual post here on this machine but someone stated that this sounded like a leap of faith. (was it steve c? and did he mention Kierkegaard? pls say more about this steve.) rafael writes: [...] >All this remains terribly speculative if we >do not conceive it in the sense of a _formale Anzeige_ i.e. as a start for >living without fundament, open (among others) to _some-thing_ we have being >calling (in both sense of the word) got. in _What Calls for Thinking?_ H says: ------------------------------------------------ "[...] we are attempting to learn thinking. The way is long. We dare take only a few steps. If all goes well, they will take us to the foothills of thought. But they will take us to places which we must explore to reach the point where only the leap will help further. The leap alone takes us into the neighborhood where thinking resides. [...]" "[...] the leap takes us abruptly to where everything is different [...]" "[...] To keep clear of prejudice, we must be ready and willing to listen. Such readiness allows us to surmount the boundaries in which all customary views are confined, and to reach a more open terrain. [...] "[...] If he is to become a true cabinetmaker, he makes himself answer and respond above all to the different kinds of wood and to the shapes slumbering within wood--to wood as it enters into the man's dwelling with all the hidden riches of its nature. In fact, this relatedness to wood is what maintains the whole craft. Without that relatedness, the craft will never be anything but empty busywork. [...]" "[...] We are trying to learn thinking. Perhaps thinking, too, is just something like building a cabinet. [...]" "[...] only when man speaks, does he think--not the other way around, as metaphysics still believes. Every motion of the hand in every one of its works carries itself through the element of thinking, every bearing of the hand bears itself in that element. [...]" ------------------------------------------------ the thread on Being and God is mostly filled with speculation about "equating" Being and God. .. or substituting God for Being .. or not equating Being and God .. or some sequenced formula .. ... all calculative thinking it seems to me. perhaps Being expressed in being is "known" only as the cabinet maker "knows" wood or _is_ *related* to wood. it seems to me that praxis is the only kind of question that IS the question of the meaning of Being. Robert T. Guevara | guevara-AT-rain.org Electrical Engineer | guevarb-AT-mugu.navy.mil Camarillo CA, USA | http://www.rain.org/~guevara --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005