Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 01:50:27 +0800 (WST)
From: Malcolm Riddoch <riddoch-AT-central.murdoch.edu.au>
Subject: Re: beyng & irony


>Robert V. Scheetz wrote:
>
>> Baby  dasein  seems to fit the case rather well.
>
>Hey Bob...the only problem I see with Baby Dasein is that you are making
>assumptions about what is going on with him/her. You don't really know
>what is going on for Baby Dasein.  You just assume a theory about what
>is going on based on some behavior you are seeing (Melanie Klein did the
>same thing). The advantage with hammering is that I can talk
>phenomenologically about what is going on for me when I hammer (where
>S&Z begins...no?).
>
>Michael Staples

Yes, we need to get in contact with some infant Daseins then, or maybe
theorize about our own infancy? I don't mind Klein's interpretations
though, she's the definitive psychodynamic theorist for me. A brilliant
theorist don't you think?

Malcolm Riddoch




     --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---