Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1998 23:00:36 -0400 From: ay581-AT-yfn.ysu.edu (Robert V. Scheetz) Subject: identity & difference Rafael, >There is no matter of _resemblence_ with regard to god/ereignis. not even a sorta god-residue? a mystico/theologico omega, godot? The substantivation of the verb "being" into "Being" along with Ereignis seems stunningly reminiscent of old god revealing himself to moses as a form of the verb "to be". >...verwinden_, the last means something like: taking care of >a sickness, but also: to spin (drehen, winden). So, there is no >question of >getting rid of metaphysics in the for instance Hegelian sense of >_Aufhebung_, or even of letting behind (in the sense of a linear >pro-gress, >fort-schritt). It is the question of how to deal with _it_ in >order to >transform our-selves (something similar as what happens at the >individual >level when we look _back_ to our history(ies), see Freud). h's fixation on the parmenidean text parallels the idealist, rational=real, formulation; and the confrontation-leap-appropriation structure, the dialectic-synthesis; so, can't mh along with freud and marx be seen as matured (phenomenal, phylogenic, helical...) articulations... (sorta the um-, eigen-, and mit-logics ...theo- , psycho-, and socio-) of hegelianism? bob --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005