File spoon-archives/heidegger.archive/heidegger_1998/heidegger.9808, message 52


Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1998 23:00:36 -0400
From: ay581-AT-yfn.ysu.edu (Robert V. Scheetz)
Subject: identity & difference




Rafael,

>There is no matter of _resemblence_ with regard to god/ereignis.

not even a sorta god-residue? 
a mystico/theologico omega, godot?
The substantivation of the verb "being" into "Being"
along with Ereignis seems stunningly reminiscent of
old god revealing himself to moses as a form of 
the verb "to be".
 
>...verwinden_, the last means something like: taking care of
>a sickness, but also: to spin (drehen, winden). So, there is no >question of
>getting rid of metaphysics in the for instance Hegelian sense of
>_Aufhebung_, or even of letting behind (in the sense of a linear >pro-gress,
>fort-schritt). It is the question of how to deal with _it_ in >order to
>transform our-selves (something similar as what happens at the >individual
>level when we look _back_ to our history(ies), see Freud).

h's fixation on the parmenidean text  parallels the idealist, rational=real, formulation;
and the confrontation-leap-appropriation structure, the dialectic-synthesis;
so, can't  mh along with freud and marx be seen as matured (phenomenal, phylogenic,
helical...) articulations... (sorta the um-, eigen-, and mit-logics
...theo- , psycho-, and socio-) of hegelianism?

bob


     --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005