Subject: RE: FW: More Meaning Again
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1998 11:50:41 -0500


Yes I agree, Greg. I'm going back to SZ to review once again (and again, and
again) the relationship between verstehen, befindlichkeit, and meaning. Back
to the basics, again.

Michael

> ----------
> From: 	GBORGERSON-AT-delphi.com[SMTP:GBORGERSON-AT-delphi.com]
> Reply To: 	heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
> Sent: 	Friday, November 13, 1998 3:37 PM
> To: 	heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
> Subject: 	Re: FW: More Meaning Again
> 
> Hi Micheal,
> 
> 	Sorry I haven't posted to this yet, I'm really thinking about it
> and want to review some of this material before I respond fully but my 
> initial thought was that thinking of meaning as an indicator doesn'y
> convey the richness of the phenomenon. I think it can only be understood
> as language-understanding-opening-uncovering.
> 
> more later,
> 
> Greg
> 
> 
>      --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
> 


     --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---