Subject: Blue skies Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 10:33:03 PST If someone said, "Look up, the sky is blue", and you smiled in agreement, and then later, when this same person was revealed to be an old Nazi spy, would you look up suddenly to the sky in disbelief? Or is this debate an instance of 'interpretation', whereas the blueness of sky is not contested, but interpretations of Hiedegger's texts are in dispute and so it matters. One side saying Hiedegger's writings are, the other that they are not, to be judged according to expediencies in the 'realpolitik' of the Worlding Games. For those few in every age who come solidly up against the wall of the not yet revealed, and who know 'who' (or rather 'what') they are, bearers of a new perspective with force strong enough to change all old perceptions towards the higher, they are of necessity a bit paranoid. Their feeling is one of knowing the fanciful nature of human mortality, and unmorbidly feel that what they have seen is important enough to future to feel uneasy that their relating of this vision might be mortally cut short. Expediency and caution concerning activities in 'the real world', the social, are seen by them as necessary to proactively counter at times. I think this particular feeling is also part of Clinton's dilemma, as his faulty judgement resulting from personal passion threatens the good he feels he uniquely has the power yet to give to the Worlding games. He re-acted 'expediently' for what he perceived as the higher good. In terms of genre, isn't this the difference between those who think Hiedegger or Clinton did what they themselves would have done in the same situation, in order to survive the penalties meted by the regimes of 'truth', over a matter they felt did not threaten this regime personally (since, in Clinton's case at least, it is unlikely their regimental daughters are more vulnerable to Clinton than to the boy down the street), versus those who are 'convicted' that their regime of truth is the only thing that stands between them and the barbaric? I realize these remarks are simplistic and flawed, but still a gram inheres. Billy ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005