File spoon-archives/heidegger.archive/heidegger_1999/heidegger.9901, message 86


Subject: re: Re: Routledge Guidebook to Being and Time
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 08:20:50 -0500



Gelvin's has come up several times.  I believe it is one of the older, 
in English; i think its an old "harper Torchbook."

But I also think it take sB&T through an existentialist lens, and does 
not develop, what can i say?, a more subject-less B&T.

Another interesting "older" commentary/inro is _The Anatomy of 
Disillusion_ by McCumber  (NW Univ Press; part of the old Phenom & 
Exist. series)


On Wed, 20 Jan 1999 11:06:09 -0500 (EST) Patrick M Murphy 
<pmurphy-AT-Oswego.EDU> wrote:

> There is a good introduction to BT by Michael Gelven, particularly good
> for undergraduates and folk who are first getting introduced to Heidegger.
> The citation is: Michael Gelven, A Commentary on Heidegger's Being and
> Time: A Section-by-Section Interpretation.  New York, Evanston, and
> London: Harper & Row, 1970.  
> 
> Yrs, Pat 
> 
> Dr. Patrick M. Murphy
> Department of English
> SUNY Oswego
> Oswego, NY 13126
> 
> On Wed, 20 Jan 1999, Stuart Elden wrote:
> 
> > I'd say it was a good start, but nothing more. It doesn't set out to be any
> > more than an initial guide, and it does what it says. If I ever teach B&T I
> > would certainly recommend it. I'd say it was more in tune with Being and
> > Time than Dreyfus' Being-in-the-World, which has an agenda of its own as
> > well (and only really covers division I). Other than Dreyfus I can't think
> > of any other book that aims to do the same (there are intros to H generally,
> > but not to B&T itself). Any others out there?
> > 
> > Best wishes
> > 
> > Stuart
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ryan Stubblefield <vorpal-AT-iname.com>
> > To: Heidegger List <heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu>
> > Date: Wednesday, January 20, 1999 07:32
> > Subject: Routledge Guidebook to Being and Time
> > 
> > 
> > >Has anyone had any experience with the Routledge Guidbook to Being and
> > >Time (by Steven Mulhall)?  Is it a decent secondary source for studying
> > >B&T?
> > >
> > >Thanks,
> > >Ryan Stubblefield
> > >
> > >
> > >     --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >      --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
> > 
> 
> 
> 
>      --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---

---------------------- 

henry sholar
hwsholar-AT-uncg.edu



     --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005