Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 19:56:05 -0700
Subject: obeying



"To obey, in a single direction, and for a long time, ---"

that has always been my most embarrassing weak ness. I always do obey, and
even in a single direction, and even for a long time inas much as i'm still
N's most ardent devotee by farrrrrrrrrrrrrr, but i keep on keeping on to
awandering down shortly long-lost years of bad investments made in merely
salting the roadbed with the grossest of quotidians, and now that i'm older
and far less wiser - -

still, needles to say - the most burning question ever i got from (either
foucault or deleuze or both) is something that runs effectively thus:

"yeah kenneth, but now WHAT (in the holy fuckin hell (sic)) are you gonna
_________DO__________ with it now that you've gotten it".

i'm embarassed to report, apparently not much

but ya know, cowgirls and cowboys of "Being and its consequences" here,
what is, is - and that is about as close as i come to eastern thot.

eastern thot is always the most beautiful, but unfortunately also always
the least productive (in therms of the lifeforce, too resignatory but
always in the most supernicest way, while N on the oter han

woooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

but then "who is strong enough for this dangerous maybe" (for this
possible) (for this infinite wow) - - - - -(N)

dam!!

kenneth the weak

who's epitaph will read: "one who found some newly sayable wow, but was
always too (late/early: pik 1) to say it and so this demised bearer of a
new say was left behind with no more than a partially total unaspirated -
unpixeled ----- ? (tho the analytics would analyze me otherwise)
at
the
end"

and all for no more reason than merely quotidian animale rationale
reasonings (ie it is tres difficult to live for long periods at the
rarefied height N found himself most at home in- and yet it is the ONLY
place where life has the barest slimmest chance to rise above the merely
calculative "word" games of Being (and especially calculations from those
"beings" who use these words to say calculatively, "well, that's not what
I"M doing, I"M defining this "state" of quotidian affairs otherwise, follow
me deeply thuswise into the depths of the meditative") (f--k!!!)

-k

X

who's merely a life force in transition to
an otherwise
and if you abhor ahabian madness
filter me

and continue on your sanity driven way

into the grave
and its
clay covered irrefutable statement

   meantime don't bother me with donic (as in quixotic) details-
truth sucks, anthony is "the truth"

erg-----0
--
"I", incarnated neither as an atheist nor beliver but only one who wishes
to know the deepest things whateer they are - what they actually are

and who needs more beer, jan?, some cheap coors would be fineooooo

oh, and:

"where is the lightning to lick you with it tongue? Where is the madness,
with which you should be cleansed?

"Behold, I teach you the Superman: he is this lightning, he is this madness!"
(Z-Prologue 3)

kismet

X? (sometimes -tho less and less these days)

and what have you done to overcome man? you have killed an exception only
in order to prove a rule

somebody sto(m)p me

jus beer drivels

maybe i shud try some red wine nex.time

then the moon will be much bluer and the grain will have lost its glint and
ice will roll itself up in my sweet baby's arms

if'n i had a sweet baby that is, they're quite expensive as you all no

ok ok, i'll do the western union, or maybe now its the hyper text markup
language [html], bit, or both at the same time:

<stop>

goodnite me brothers

<really stop>

(n regret it all in the morning)





     --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---