Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 10:26:39 -0800 From: Kenneth Johnson <kenn-AT-beef.sparks.nv.us> Subject: Re: Method Rene Schreef: >I think, that what Heidegger is at, is a radical turning of position: >in a Hoelderlin poem, or in a text of Leibniz, is the opening, which >is enough for itself. They don't need us. At most, we need them. >A very strange use of the word 'is', that must be admitted, but >the only one, that can free the historical from the available. > >Nietzsche 2, German p. 9, heading "ER and WtP": > >"Die Gewesenheit ist die Befreiung des scheinbar nur Vergangenen >in sein Wesen [...] Das WESENDE Vergangene, die je entworfene >Seiendheit als verhuellte Wahrheit des Seins, ueberherrscht alles, >was als gegenwaertig und, kraft seiner Wirksamkeit, als das Wirkliche >gilt." Alta Vista Schreef's this as: " the beingness is the release apparently only of the passing into its nature [... ] the WESENDE passing, the beingness per sketched as veiled truth of the Seins, over-prevails everything that is considered to strength of its effectiveness as present and, as the real. " uh, - - - huh? uh, Michael, was sagt dieses wirklich? kenneth --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005