From: HealantHenry-AT-aol.com
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 17:56:00 EST
Subject: Re: Method



In a message dated 23/02/2002 5:29:37 PM, crifasi-AT-hotmail.com writes:

<< I opposed "Dasein's essence 
is an existent" to "Dasein's essence is not an existent". >>

Ah, the deja view of rolling years and the hermeneutical circle of friends on 
this list.
Perhaps now I will be able to move my remaining pawns and learn further 
Anthony, what you've been up to openly here for years.

If Dasein's essence is along with Dasein's existence, and as along-with, an 
issue for Dasein, indeed THE issue for Dasein, what matters the usage of the 
word "Wesen" for anything of Dasein? Is it not completely removed, as "Wesen" 
from discussion? Is it not subsumed into the ontological phenomenology?

So that Dasein, throughout the epochs of Being manifests (and temporally, by 
Dasein's mode of being-with and being-alongside) all the "essences" traceable 
and un-?

Have I lost the import of your distinction? Am I about to retrieve it?

Thanks,
Hen


     --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---