From: "Anthony Crifasi" <crifasi-AT-hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Method
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 04:24:33 


Hen wrote:

>If Dasein's essence is along with Dasein's existence, and as along-with, an
>issue for Dasein, indeed THE issue for Dasein, what matters the usage of 
>the
>word "Wesen" for anything of Dasein? Is it not completely removed, as 
>"Wesen"
>from discussion? Is it not subsumed into the ontological phenomenology?
>
>So that Dasein, throughout the epochs of Being manifests (and temporally, 
>by
>Dasein's mode of being-with and being-alongside) all the "essences" 
>traceable
>and un-?

Yes, but how is this analysis philosophically initiated in the first place? 
With the assumption that Dasein's essence is not an existent. If our essence 
were an existent, then our fundamental mode of being would NOT be 
being-with. So the entire explanation in terms of being-with depends on the 
assumption that Dasein's essence is not an exisent in the first place.

Anthony Crifasi

_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com



     --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---