Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 05:37:17 EDT Subject: Re: Yo, Gary --part1_93.21348933.2a80f2cd_boundary In a message dated 06/08/2002 02:50:07 GMT Daylight Time, crifasi-AT-hotmail.com writes: > Subj:Yo, Gary > Date:06/08/2002 02:50:07 GMT Daylight Time > From: crifasi-AT-hotmail.com (Anthony Crifasi) > Sender: owner-heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu > Reply-to: <A HREF="mailto:heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu">heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu</A> > To: heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu > > > > > Gary C. Moore wrote: > > >>We cannot use experience itself to justify our words to others (i.e., > >>"Ive been there," "Ive actually have been in such a situation and really > >>know all about it," etc.), but we can use rational discourse that makes > >>sense to others based on the hypothesis we generally in form ("contour" > of > >>action would be a good definition of form and would fit in with the > >>phenomenological Aristotle, certainly with Hegel, and definitely with the > >>segment of Heidegger I quoted from his ARISTOTLES METAPHYSICS Theta 1-3 I > >>quoted for Crifasi and he completely ignored)<< Jud: Hi Gary, It was only on a re-reading of this passage, prompted by Anthony's comments, that my eyes homed in again on the delicious and felicitous descriptive term:"contour of action," which, though you meant it in an entirely different, [and also telling way,] is a perfectly suitable form of description of "shape." In case this sounds a bit strange, I will put it another way. As you know I believe that any material thing is a Gesamtsumme or nexus of the totality of the micro-modalities of the community of micro-entities of which it is constituted. The constant interior interactions, interpenetrations, changes, expirations, renewals, initiations, create the shape or form or "essesnce," [to use the old fashioned word] of the thing. The term "contour of action" is thus very apposite as a way of describing the appeance to us humans of macro results of this mass of these seething interior proceedings - for any object is actually a conglomerate of moiling action which gives the macro object it exterior contour. To illustrate what I mean, take take a peek at an old photograph of yourself from your youth - and then a look in the mirror. Is the term yours or did you come across it somewhere? regards, Jud. > > I hope you got my previous message in which I said that I had a hard time > figuring out what you were saying in that part of your post. If you could > explain it again, I could address it. > > >>Hegel essentially said, much like Heidegger, that he found most of his > >>philosophy in his reading of Aristotle. So when some one like Crifasi > says > >>the two fundamentally disagree, then one goes against what they > themselves > >>have stated.<< > > But that is not a problem for phenomenologists. For example, Thomas Aquinas > also explicitly finds most of his essential philosophy in his reading of > Aristotle, and yet phenomenologists interpret Aquinas as a gross distortion > of Aristotle. So there is nothing wrong with going against a philosopher's > statement of agreement with another philosopher. > > Anthony Crifasi > > _________________________________________________________________ > Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > http://www.hotmail.com > > > > --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- > > > ----------------------- Headers -------------------------------- > Return-Path: <owner-heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu> > Received: from rly-xf04.mx.aol.com (rly-xf04.mail.aol.com > [172.20.105.228]) by air-xf04.mail.aol.com (v86_r1.16) with ESMTP id > MAILINXF44-0805215007; Mon, 05 Aug 2002 21:50:07 -0400 > Received: from mail.virginia.edu (mail.virginia.edu [128.143.2.9]) by > rly-xf04.mx.aol.com (v86_r1.15) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINXF49-0805214940; > Mon, 05 Aug 2002 21:49:40 -0400 > Received: from lists.village.virginia.edu by mail.virginia.edu id aa12873; > 5 Aug 2002 21:49 EDT > Received: (from domo-AT-localhost) > by lists.village.Virginia.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.0) id VAA22945 > for heidegger-outgoing; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 21:49:02 -0400 (EDT) > X-Authentication-Warning: lists.village.Virginia.EDU: domo set sender to > owner-heidegger-AT-localhost using -f > Received: from hotmail.com (f188.law9.hotmail.com [64.4.9.188]) > by lists.village.Virginia.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.0) with ESMTP id VAA22941 > for <heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu>; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 21:48:59 > -0400 (EDT) > Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; > Mon, 5 Aug 2002 18:48:28 -0700 > Received: from 205.188.209.77 by lw9fd.law9.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; > Tue, 06 Aug 2002 01:48:28 GMT > X-Originating-IP: [205.188.209.77] > From: Anthony Crifasi <crifasi-AT-hotmail.com> > To: heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu > Subject: Yo, Gary > Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2002 01:48:28 +0000 > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed > Message-ID: <F188T9VTgVt6u81bMM200006af3-AT-hotmail.com> > X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Aug 2002 01:48:28.0774 (UTC) > FILETIME=[5C905860:01C23CEB] > Sender: owner-heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu > Precedence: bulk > Reply-To: heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu > > > --part1_93.21348933.2a80f2cd_boundary
HTML VERSION:
Subj:Yo, Gary
Date:06/08/2002 02:50:07 GMT Daylight Time
From: crifasi-AT-hotmail.com (Anthony Crifasi)
Sender: owner-heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
Reply-to: heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
To: heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
Gary C. Moore wrote:
>>We cannot use experience itself to justify our words to others (i.e.,
>>"Ive been there," "Ive actually have been in such a situation and really
>>know all about it," etc.), but we can use rational discourse that makes
>>sense to others based on the hypothesis we generally in form ("contour" of
>>action would be a good definition of form and would fit in with the
>>phenomenological Aristotle, certainly with Hegel, and definitely with the
>>segment of Heidegger I quoted from his ARISTOTLES METAPHYSICS Theta 1-3 I
>>quoted for Crifasi and he completely ignored)<<
I hope you got my previous message in which I said that I had a hard time
figuring out what you were saying in that part of your post. If you could
explain it again, I could address it.
>>Hegel essentially said, much like Heidegger, that he found most of his
>>philosophy in his reading of Aristotle. So when some one like Crifasi says
>>the two fundamentally disagree, then one goes against what they themselves
>>have stated.<<
But that is not a problem for phenomenologists. For example, Thomas Aquinas
also explicitly finds most of his essential philosophy in his reading of
Aristotle, and yet phenomenologists interpret Aquinas as a gross distortion
of Aristotle. So there is nothing wrong with going against a philosopher's
statement of agreement with another philosopher.
Anthony Crifasi
_________________________________________________________________
Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com
--- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005