File spoon-archives/heidegger.archive/heidegger_2003/heidegger.0302, message 28


From: "Anthony Crifasi" <crifasi-AT-hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: two third pro-war?
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 16:35:33 +0000


Rene de Bakker wrote:

> >This is such a common philosophical mistake.
>
>Well mister, another repeat.
>Your stubborness is truly unique, congratulations!

You are still misunderstanding, because Heidegger does NOT make the demand 
that you made from on high:

"one must be able to make clear, in how far one's victory is different from 
an other".

Heidegger's analytic encompasses not only both "sides" of a proposition 
(affirmation and negation of the same and different), but also to the very 
need for the affirmation/negation dichotomy in the first place. Your demand 
above clearly shows that you are still dwelling within that dichotomy ("one 
MUST be able to make clearly how" one "is different" - i.e., how A is 
NOT-A), and are therefore clearly on a philosophically lower level. Your 
appeal to Heidegger in your earlier post is therefore out of order. That is 
why your accusation is philosophically out of line: you fall precisely into 
the mode of those "standarded intellectuals," while Heidegger does not.

Anthony Crifasi

_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail



     --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005