Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 06:24:22 -0800 (PST)
From: Jason Stuart <jts0803odon-AT-yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Shock'N'Awe


--0-1559487020-1048775062=:40032


 
 Anthony Crifasi <crifasi-AT-hotmail.com> wrote:
Jason, John Foster knows Heidegger about as well as the average 
undergraduate, who continually and inauthentically interprets every 
ontological term ontically

Unfortunately, I also have to acknowledge the debt I owe to you, Rene, Allen, and Niala for clarifying/remuddying the o/o argument and others; while I've read H. more recently than John, I probably haven't read him much better.  My "Heidegger" folder is stuffed full of the o/o threads.  

It's odd, the way critical theorists approach it:  we start with Aristotle, work our way through literary history until we get to, say, Derrida and Eagleton and the likes, realize that it's not literary anymore, and then have to dig our way through philosophy, backwards, until we get to Aristotle again.  We must get tired easy, considering how much crap theory there is out there. 

JS



!-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------!

 "...even if he recopied them later, as I suspect he sometimes did, he marked his card or cards not with the date of his final adjustments, but with that of his Corrected Draft or first Fair Copy. I mean, he preserved the date of actual creation rather than that of second or third thoughts. There is a very loud amusement park right in front of my present lodgings."



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!
--0-1559487020-1048775062=:40032

HTML VERSION:

 Anthony Crifasi <crifasi-AT-hotmail.com> wrote:

Jason, John Foster knows Heidegger about as well as the average
undergraduate, who continually and inauthentically interprets every
ontological term ontically

Unfortunately, I also have to acknowledge the debt I owe to you, Rene, Allen, and Niala for clarifying/remuddying the o/o argument and others; while I've read H. more recently than John, I probably haven't read him much better.  My "Heidegger" folder is stuffed full of the o/o threads. 

It's odd, the way critical theorists approach it:  we start with Aristotle, work our way through literary history until we get to, say, Derrida and Eagleton and the likes, realize that it's not literary anymore, and then have to dig our way through philosophy, backwards, until we get to Aristotle again.  We must get tired easy, considering how much crap theory there is out there.

JS

!-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------!

 "...even if he recopied them later, as I suspect he sometimes did, he marked his card or cards not with the date of his final adjustments, but with that of his Corrected Draft or first Fair Copy. I mean, he preserved the date of actual creation rather than that of second or third thoughts. There is a very loud amusement park right in front of my present lodgings."