From: "Anthony Crifasi" <crifasi-AT-hotmail.com> Subject: Re: Shooting at Slits (rather than Iraqis.) Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 15:28:11 +0000 GEVANS613-AT-aol.com wrote: >Could it be that the apparent chaotic behaviour of the electrons in these >experiments, and the ostensibly random or unpredictable passage through >one >slit or the other, is not because of some mysterious cosmic randomness, or >a >significant abberation in the "laws" of physics, but simply because >individual electrons [like individual bullets] behave individually >depending >upon their separate particularities, coefficients of expansion, their spin >differentials, the effects of gravitation, and the concomitant distortional >effects imparted by the electron-gun, [like the rifle barrel] upon the >ballistical behavioural differences that flow from the existential >differentiation and contrasting modalities of the individual electrons >themselves? > >I would very much appreciate any comments from others on the list more >skilled in matters scientific on this matter. As a former theoretical physics major, I believe I qualify. To explain the mysterious nature of the double slit experiment, let me describe it. If you shoot a stream of electrons through a barrior with one slit in it, the electron impact pattern the other side (after going through the slit) will look very "normal," like shooting a stream of bullets through a single hole. The impact pattern will be very dense at one point (i.e., directly behind the slit), and gradually spread out the farther away from that spot you go, just like if you shoot a stream of bullets (with decent aim) at a target, the impact pattern will be more dense at the target spot, and gradually become more spread out and less dense the farther away from that spot you get. Now, when you add a SECOND hole to the barrior and shoot a stream of electrons so that they can go through both holes instead of just one, the impact pattern you get on the opposite side becomes a wave interference pattern, as if the electrons going through one hole came out and "interfering" or "knocked with" the electrons coming out of the other hole, before finally impacting. So instead of the single spray pattern described earlier with one hole, you get certain areas in the final impact pattern where no electrons hit, and other spots where they do hit: a wave interference pattern. It is called a wave interference pattern because the pattern is exactly the same as that of two circular wavefronts (e.g., of water) hitting each other, causing a pattern of crests and troughs on some barrior. Picture dipping two fingers in water at once, creating two expanding circular wavefronts which eventually meet each other, and interfere with each other where they meet. So there's nothing really mysterious about this yet, since the wave interference pattern caused by the electron stream going through two holes can be explained by the electrons going through one hole emerging and "interfering" with the electrons going through the other hole before finally impacting on the final barrior. Now, let's repeat the above with only ONE electron at a time, instead of a stream (electron guns can be slowed down to that extent). Open only one slit for them to go through. What's the impact pattern you expect after many single shots? The first pattern - one dense spot directly behind the slit, gradually spreading out the farther away from that spot you get. That's what you get. Everything's normal, right? Now, open TWO slits and allow only one electron at a time through, and the mystery begins. What's the pattern you expect? After all, there is only one electron emitted at a time, so there are not electrons going through both holes emerging and interfering with each other before impact, so you wouldn't expect an interference pattern at impact. So you would expect the first pattern behind each slit - one dense spot behind each slit, gradually spreading out the farther away from each spot you get. BUT THAT'S NOT WHAT YOU GET. You get the wave interference pattern, EVEN THOUGH THERE IS NOT MORE THAN ONE ELECTRON EMITTED AT ANY TIME, and therefore no "interference," since that would require one electron interfering with another one. That's why the two-slit impact pattern cannot be explained through any normal notion of interference, since interference is by definition interference on one thing by another, so you would need at least two electrons, or at least you would need something affecting the electron gun. But there are not two electrons at any time (since only one is emitted at a time), nor is anything affect the electron gun because ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS OPEN TWO HOLES IN THE BARRIOR, without even touching the gun. That is why it is mysterious and cannot be explained by previous physical principles, and is indeed quite mysterious. Anthony Crifasi _________________________________________________________________ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005