Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 08:46:15 +0100
Subject: the moving
From: michaelP <michael-AT-sandwich-de-sign.co.uk>


> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

--MS_Mac_OE_3132809175_609822_MIME_Part

kenneth wrote this:

> You see, and you act. Only you don't
> shoot at movement. You never squeeze off your shot until you know exactly
> what you're shootin' at. Tenderfeet, they shoot at movement.

yes, tenderfeet thinkers aim their points of view at movement and not at
what moves movables, something that does not move at all (the 'immovable
mover'?), something that rests in the restlessness of the confused masses,
at peace in the moving and removing that the tenderfeet-polloi see as the
stuff to focus their shots upon... and then they blink and say "we have
grasped stuff and invented happy-thinking" and relax in their hasty
stupidities... {and what moves them so? I ask in all timidity}

[I know, kenneth, I have willingly misinterpreted and misunderstood your
piece for my own purposes, but I don't give a fig :-)]

best wishes

michaelP 

--MS_Mac_OE_3132809175_609822_MIME_Part

HTML VERSION:

> You see, and you act. Only you don't
> shoot at movement. You never squeeze off your shot until you know exactly
> what you're shootin' at. Tenderfeet, they shoot at movement.