From: HealantHenry-AT-aol.com
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 08:25:11 EDT
Subject: Re: World corporatism and the Enframing of work



In a message dated 4/25/03 7:56:46 AM, R.B.M.deBakker-AT-uva.nl writes:

>... while remaining phenomenology. Perceiving a river would be poetical
>too.
>
>Possibly one of the first blows to this poetics has been Aristoteles' 
determination
>of a river as a hypo-keimenon, Vor-lage or Unter-lage, sub-stratum for
>an orderly speaking.
>
>(No, the other way around: it was an ersatz-answer when muthos as archaic
>everydayness had died.)
>

>Even looking at this screen: poetry. (Kant: the dark field of productive
>Einbildungskraft)
>In fact, he calls it: Phenomenology of the inconspicious. Everyone, as
>a sensing being, is capable of it, and it is possible at any moment, at any 
place.  
>
>I agreed very much with your note on the instrumental. People have always
>used instruments, as they have always died. So tech and death in H don't
>indicate those topics unhistorically, in general. In BT this is not so
>clear yet, although the question for the validity of ontological existentials
>
>cannot be elided. Husserl's resistance might be explained from Heidegger's
>word in a late seminar, that he, Husserl, completely missed the 
geschichtliche
>dimension. (point proved by the Crisis, I think.) To Heidegger, Geschichte
>is the releasing instance, he writes often. Which means, that without the
>insight in Geschichte, we cannot understand what is now.* But it is the 
not-understanding,
>the walking-into-a-wall-character of H's thinking till 1930, that urges
>toward Geschichte. 

>*Mating of Ereignis (Being) and Geschick (Geschichte, time), in TB

Rene,
I can easily be swayed to a think of the notorious 'Kehre' producing the 
notorious early & late heid.s as... less so, as you and Michael Eldred 
indicate.

 Still, one sees a reformating of the picture as Heidegger promotes the 
phenomena of poetry; the inescapable image begins to wiggle like  a computer 
screen, top to bottom, a cascade of new insight, tho there remains the 
phenomenology...  nonetheless there is now "thinking Being historically."  As 
if the crusade for such at the end of SZ, division II was called off, and a 
table was set, and all invited to table for a nourishing meal...

and that does bring us to (aside from where is now Mitsein on the new 
screen?) Geschichte: 
1) these epochs, these handy (heid does warn of the handiness of the 
epochs--- the beads on a string, the ontological rosary) evolutionary train 
stations on the metaphysical journey.  

2)  Geschichte:  the now, the 'releasing instance'. The letting be/go/will to 
unwill.



     --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---