Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 20:08:29 +0800
Subject: Re: more Husserl on Heidegger
From: Malcolm Riddoch <m.riddoch-AT-ecu.edu.au>



On Tuesday, April 29, 2003, at 08:10  AM, Anthony Crifasi wrote:

>>> So for Heidegger, the being of the world is constitutive of Dasein,
>>
>> No, the temporality of Dasein's intentional structure is constitutive 
>> for how we understand both world and self.
>
> "World" is constitutive of being-in-the-WORLD. The fact that "world" 
> can be temporally explicated does not change what I said.

Actually it does if you want to remain with phenomenology, which means 
with both Husserl and at least the early Heidegger... otherwise you're 
just talking about some sort of traditional Husserlian idealism and 
Heideggerean realism. I'm pretty damn sure that both self and world 
together in the temporalising unity of Dasein, is constitutive of 
being-in-the-world, not just the 'WORLD'.

Cheers,

Malcolm



     --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---