From: "Anthony Crifasi" <crifasi-AT-hotmail.com> Subject: o/o Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 15:12:07 +0000 Rene de Bakker wrote: >I found a smashing treatment of o/o in Gelassenheit, that is >in the conversation. Still interested in o/o itself, and >not merely in its use as a weapon in ontic issues? First, yes post it. Secondly, I was not using it as a weapon in ontic issues. I was responding to what I saw as John Foster's conflation of the ontic with the ontological in his anti-war argument. My main issue on this list has always primarily been about the interpretation and mis-interpretation of Heidegger. The fact that Heidegger was being misinterpretated for the sake of an ontically wrong side only added to my motivation. Anthony Crifasi _________________________________________________________________ Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005