File spoon-archives/heidegger.archive/heidegger_2003/heidegger.0305, message 121


From: "Anthony Crifasi" <crifasi-AT-hotmail.com>
Subject: o/o
Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 15:12:07 +0000


Rene de Bakker wrote:

>I found a smashing treatment of o/o in Gelassenheit, that is
>in the conversation. Still interested in o/o itself, and
>not merely in its use as a weapon in ontic issues?

First, yes post it. Secondly, I was not using it as a weapon in ontic 
issues. I was responding to what I saw as John Foster's conflation of the 
ontic with the ontological in his anti-war argument. My main issue on this 
list has always primarily been about the interpretation and 
mis-interpretation of Heidegger. The fact that Heidegger was being 
misinterpretated for the sake of an ontically wrong side only added to my 
motivation.

Anthony Crifasi

_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail



     --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005