Subject: RE: wolfowitcki Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 17:25:37 +0200 From: "Bakker, R.B.M. de" <R.B.M.deBakker-AT-uva.nl> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: GEVANS613-AT-aol.com [mailto:GEVANS613-AT-aol.com] Verzonden: dinsdag 3 juni 2003 17:15 Aan: heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu Onderwerp: Re: wolfowitcki In a message dated 03/06/2003 13:14:44 GMT Daylight Time, R.B.M.deBakker-AT-uva.nl writes: No Anthony, you're just talking like your English coalition partner the not so sweet Jud. That is, if he would have sthing to say now, which not. He too thought his attack was legal, but it's all gonna fall back on the one that feels forced to act Jud, I meant your attack on Heidegger, the leaf episode. Your wrong reading, now dissected by me, was invariably concluded by the usual vile political accusations, which I said you could better stop. I'm waiting for your penitence... cheers, rene <http://uncouplingthecopula.freewebspace.com>
HTML VERSION:
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----In a message dated 03/06/2003 13:14:44 GMT Daylight Time, R.B.M.deBakker-AT-uva.nl writes:
Van: GEVANS613-AT-aol.com [mailto:GEVANS613-AT-aol.com]
Verzonden: dinsdag 3 juni 2003 17:15
Aan: heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
Onderwerp: Re: wolfowitcki
No Anthony, you're just talking like your English coalition partner the not so sweet Jud. That is, if he would have sthing to say now, which not. He too thought his attack was legal, but it's all gonna fall back on the one that feels forced to act
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005