Subject: RE: The Ontological Converter.
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 14:17:57 +0200
From: "Bakker, R.B.M. de" <R.B.M.deBakker-AT-uva.nl>




-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Edward Greig [mailto:rdc41-AT-dial.pipex.com]
Verzonden: vrijdag 27 juni 2003 14:06
Aan: heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
Onderwerp: Re: The Ontological Converter.


Thanks rene
Nevertheless, a man who felt hungry and had no concept of self just had a
munch on his corporeal leg.
Thinking, guessing etc seems more truthful to me when in reality we are
dealing with a mystery.

  Edward,

  Mystery? Could you say more?


It seems to me that the question of the relationship, if any, between dasein
and the 'corporeal thing' has been diverted as a means of providing more
smoke and mirrors.
Regards Edward.

   What do you mean? Diverted by whom? Heidegger, Matthew, me ...?
   You introduced yourself as one who wanted to know about
   Heidegger, what HE is or was meaning. After that you've only
   showed insatisfaction with him vis-a-vis your question.
   Would it for instance not be advisable, to bespeak something
   written by Heidegger, that regards your question?

   regards rene







----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bakker, R.B.M. de" <R.B.M.deBakker-AT-uva.nl>
To: <heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu>
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 12:23 PM
Subject: RE: The Ontological Converter.


>
>
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Edward Greig [mailto:rdc41-AT-dial.pipex.com]
> Verzonden: vrijdag 27 juni 2003 12:01
> Aan: heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
> Onderwerp: Re: The Ontological Converter.
>
>
> Edward wrote a.o.:
>
> I believe  I guess I believe that i
>  - I can see  but I prefer
> I suspect
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Matthew King" <making-AT-velvet.net>
> To: <heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu>
> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 6:41 AM
> Subject: Re: The Ontological Converter.
>
>
> > On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Edward Greig wrote:
> >
> > > Paradoxically I agree with most of what I have read by Heidegger
except
> > > his central plank!
> >
> > Do you really think philosophers should be agreed or disagreed with? Do
> > you really think anything that can genuinely be agreed or disagreed with
> > is worth your philosophical time?
> >
> > Matthew
>
>
> Yeh, Matthew, hammer on the nail.
>
> At night, I can go to bed, or smoke a cigarette, or go out, or think
> about freedom, Everything seems to affirm my subjectivity.
>
> But I can only go to bed because there is a bed, etc. I can only
> choose to go to the station, because the station is there.
>
> The lady in Zollikon, who forgot her bag, because she would have been
> thinking of her husband, can only forget the bag, because the bag is
> on the chair. It's really very simple, but the subject nowadays
> always gets in between, to turn everything upside down.
>
> regards
>
> rene
>
>
>
>
> anti-americanism: sounds like anti-semitism...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>      --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
>




     --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---


     --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---