Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 06:40:54 +0100 Subject: Re: remember From: michaelP <michael-AT-sandwich-de-sign.co.uk> Rick: >> Conscience says nothing, or rather 'again', as the >> >> silence indicates how one has already been spoken, >> >> demanding the past to be heard, that it was heard. Allen: > It must have been heard! How else did I get here, incomplete > in my determined completion (or something like that said by > Wallace Stevens). More accessable up here is Proust: > > It is rare indeed that we finish well, for if all was > well, we'd never finish. Michael: ... yes, and the beat goes on. How does the past pass on, get passed; or how does the passing past become the past, the passed over? Nietzsche says that revenge against the past (and its it was) is history and that freedom from this history of revenge (nihilism) is the rainbow bridge, the passing over to the sunshiny superman; but, but how can such a freedom from revenge be possibilised without wreaking revenge upon the revenge so far? Is this at all related to the not-taking-the-side of not-taking-sides? (that I thought, or tried to think, as 'peace' during all that opining accompanying the war)... questions nothing but questions Michael unfinished --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005