File spoon-archives/heidegger.archive/heidegger_2003/heidegger.0306, message 161


Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 06:40:54 +0100
Subject: Re: remember
From: michaelP <michael-AT-sandwich-de-sign.co.uk>


Rick:
>> Conscience says nothing, or rather 'again', as the
>> 
>> silence indicates how one has already been spoken,
>> 
>> demanding the past to be heard, that it was heard.

Allen:
> It must have been heard!  How else did I get here, incomplete
> in my determined completion (or something like that said by
> Wallace Stevens). More accessable up here is Proust:
> 
> It is rare indeed that we finish well, for if all was
> well, we'd never finish.

Michael:
... yes, and the beat goes on. How does the past pass on, get passed; or how
does the passing past become the past, the passed over? Nietzsche says that
revenge against the past (and its it was) is history and that freedom from
this history of revenge (nihilism) is the rainbow bridge, the passing over
to the sunshiny superman; but, but how can such a freedom from revenge be
possibilised without wreaking revenge upon the revenge so far? Is this at
all related to the not-taking-the-side of not-taking-sides? (that I thought,
or tried to think, as 'peace' during all that opining accompanying the
war)...

questions nothing but questions

Michael unfinished



     --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005