Subject: RE: blood for oil: we had no choice Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 17:37:14 +0200 From: "Bakker, R.B.M. de" <R.B.M.deBakker-AT-uva.nl> And now you have misportrayed Wolfowitz a SECOND TIME, Rene, by not investigating the FULL quotation, just as you did with his earlier comments concerning the "beaurocratic" reasons for war in your post last month. This is the FULL quotation of what he said: "Look, the primarily difference -- to put it a little too simply -- between North Korea and Iraq is that we had virtually no economic options with Iraq because the country floats on a sea of oil. In the case of North Korea, the country is teetering on the edge of economic collapse and that I believe is a major point of leverage whereas the military picture with North Korea is very different from that with Iraq." So Wolfowitz was comparing Iraq's oil to the economic weakiness of North Korea with reference to how much ECONOMIC LEVERAGE the US could exert on each country as an alternative method of influence. With North Korea, the US could exert much more influence economically because it is "teetering on the edge of economic collapse," whereas Iraq which "floats on a sea of oil." THAT is what he said, and it is clear if you look at the whole quote. But Rene, without investigating the full original quote, left out the second sentence and therefore made it seem like Wolfowitz was saying that the US went in for Iraqi oil! Again, Rene, as in philosophy, go to the PRIMARY sources, not secondary ones like the Guardian. Anthony Crifasi Anthony, Thanks, can't rely on the Guardian obviously. The "we had no choice" (primary source), esp. the self-centeredness that lies in the apparent evidence of it, is again troubling. It was Wolfowitz' c.s. old idea to remove Saddam, and now the opportunity was there. Is he also going to show now what is done to kids in Ivory Coast, and say: we had a choice, but we chose not to? Or: the Israelian-Palestinian conflict must stop, we have no choice but settle it? But that kind of will is not there. Would it be, you would have old Europe on your side, and not like now the new Poles, who, now also beginning to profit from EU credits, can afford American F16's. rene --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005