Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 18:21:37 +0100 Subject: Re: H in the media From: michaelP <michael-AT-sandwich-de-sign.co.uk> on 18/9/03 6:06 pm, GEVANS613-AT-aol.com at GEVANS613-AT-aol.com wrote: > Point is - is it possible to be not just a Nazi sympathiser, but a rabid, > Nazi Gold Card-carrying, > snitch-on-your-mates Nazi who went on being a Nazi even after Hitler had given > it up as a bad gig, and then, after the up-and-down arm decends from the Heil > position, to scuttle to his hideaway rat-hole of a cabin and put his > 'thinker's' hat on, and think and talk about good thoughts and about ethics > and the > sort of cultural things that decent, human, non-Nazi sympathisers, and > non-rabid, non-Nazi Gold Card-carrying, non-snitch-on-your-mates, respectable > human > Daseins do? Point is, Jud, why do you go after lightweights like Heidegger instead of those deathcamp guards, the gestapo and SS members, the architects of the final solution, the millions of ordinary germans who went along with all the slaughter and torture (soldiers, e,g.)? What you celebrate in ThatPete's rabid humour is just that -- the bileous pronouncements of those who have nothing worthwhile to say but say it in the loudest and crudest tabloidal ways possible to their teenyweeny imaginations. mP --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005